09
Jan
11

Of Bullets and Ballots

That Gabrielle Giffords, a Congresswoman and John M. Roll, a Federal Judge were shot today, in a district especially marked as a target by Ms. Palin and by a Republican Candidate in the same district, reminded me of this vintage bit of Republican rhetoric, spoken by Catherine Crabill, the Republican Party Nominee in the 99th House District of Virginia.

About these ads

5 Responses to “Of Bullets and Ballots”


  1. January 9, 2011 at 4:51 am

    Sarah Palin is also guilty of disseminating violent imagery regarding this Congressional district: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-naiman/is-palins-crosshairs-map_b_806277.html. However, at the moment it doesn’t seem that the primary suspect, Jared Lee Loughner, is a Tea Partier or Republican: he’s just a run of the mill disturbed person.

  2. 2 shigekuni
    January 10, 2011 at 2:58 am

    Yeah but it’s hard not to think that the poisoned atmosphere didn’t have something to do with this, no?

  3. January 10, 2011 at 4:13 am

    Yes, there are plenty of nutty people out there, and all they need is a story line to proceed with some pointless violent action. I hope this event will result in a toning down of the political rhetoric by Palin and others. That may happen because there will be a lot of pressure on them to behave civilly in the immediate future.

    This reminds me a bit of “Taxi Driver” (Robert DeNiro), where a lunatic who seemed to want to assassinate a politician ended up inadvertently becoming a hero when he redirected his anger to the pimp who was taking advantage of a young prostitute (Jodie Foster).

  4. 4 shigekuni
    January 11, 2011 at 8:05 pm

    I want to agree with Krugman http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/10/opinion/10krugman.html?src=ISMR_AP_LO_MST_FB but I think this is the most sane reaction so far http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/mon-january-10-2011/arizona-shootings-reaction (well, apart from the John Oliver bit)

  5. January 11, 2011 at 9:16 pm

    I generally agree with Krugman, though in this case as in others, I don’t think he writes well on broad social issues (actually he’s just a not a good writer). Jon Stewart’s is a better response. What really irritates me is David Brook’s disingenuous response: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/11/opinion/11brooks.html?src=ISMR_HP_LO_MST_FB. As an apologist for conservatives, he automatically concocts a defense in situations like this. I ordinarily don’t read his columns because they infuriate me.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Categories

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

support shigekuni

Categories


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 196 other followers

%d bloggers like this: